# Approximating distance travelled

Voiceover: A cyclist starts pedaling and accelerates for 12 seconds. The velocity v of t of the cyclist at two second intervals in feet per second is given by the table. So they tell us at different times. After four seconds the velocity is 7.5 feet per second. After eight seconds the velocity is nine feet per second. Consider the graph of

velocity versus time. Velocity versus time. Let capital r of six be

the sum of the areas of six right hand rectangles

with equal sub-divisions. It follows that capital r of six is an approximation for the total distance traveled in feet during the 12 seconds. What is the value of capital r of six? I encourage you to pause this video and try to think about it on your own and then I’ll work through it and at any time while I’m working through it, if you get inspired, feel free to pause again and try to take it all the way. Let’s think about what they’re saying. They say “consider the graph of velocity versus time.” We might as well try to plot that. I’ve got some graph paper here and we can focus on the first quadrant because all of our time values and all of our velocity values are positive. Let’s see this is time, this is velocity as a function of time axis, time goes between zero and 12 and they’re giving it to us in every two seconds. So, this is zero, two, four, six, eight, ten and 12 seconds, and then our velocity goes between zero and ten feet per second. So, this is one, two, three, four, five, I’ll just mark off some of them. Six, seven, eight, nine, ten. Now, this is in feet per second and this over here is in seconds. Let’s plot these points at time zero, velocity is zero. Time two velocity is six feet per second. Time four at 7.5 gets us right there. Time six it’s 8.5, that 8, 8.5. Time eight at eight seconds it’s nine feet per second. At ten seconds it’s 9.5 feet per second, and at 12 seconds it’s ten feet, it’s ten feet per second. What I’ve done here is I’ve just plotted the data that they’ve

given us, considering the graph of velocity

versus time, at least the data they’ve given us. We can imagine fitting a curve that looks something like this. If we were to, these

points are just sampled from a curve, they might

look something like, something like this, over there. We are now considering the graph of velocity versus time. Now let’s think about the sum of the areas of six right handed rectangles with equal sub-divisions. When they’re talking

about equal sub-divisions, they’re talking about equal sub-divisions along the independent

axis or the time axis in this case and we’re

talking about the first 12 seconds, so if we

were to divide the first 12 seconds into six equal

sections, they would each be 2 seconds wide. This would be one of them. Let me do this in a new color. They would each be 2 seconds. That’s not a new color, oh it is, blue. They’re each going to be two seconds. Let me do one that

contrasts with green better. Each of our rectangles are going to be two seconds wide and I’m just kind of starting them off at the bottom because we have to think about how tall to make them. Then they say to do

right handed rectangles. What’s a right handed rectangle? That means we define the height of the rectangle by the value of the function on the right hand side. So, for example this first rectangle, to make it a right handed

rectangle, we look at the right side, we’re

at two seconds, velocity at two seconds is six feet per second and so that’s going to be the height of our rectangle. This next one is going to look like this. Now you might say “Well, what’s a left handed rectangle then?” Well, a left handed

rectangle would be doing something like, would be

doing something like… Okay, for this first rectangle on the left hand side of it, my function is zero. So, it’s just zero. Now the next rectangle,

the left hand side, my function at two seconds, the function is six seconds. So, the left hand rectangles would look like this, would look something like that. But anyway they’re telling us to do right handed rectangles so let’s do right handed rectangles. Let me clear this a little bit. This is our first right handed rectangle. This is our second one. Let me just draw the tops. Third, fourth, fifth and sixth that was the tops of them. It’s just going to look

something like this. It’s going to look like this. This is my third one. That’s my fourth one. That’s my fifth one. Then, that’s my sixth one. They’re tell us let capital r of six be the sum of the areas of these things and they tell us that it follows that capital r of six is an approximation for the total distance traveled in feet during the 12 seconds. Now why is that? Why is the sum of these

areas an approximation for the total distance traveled? Well before calculus, you learned, that if you have a constant rate, that distance is equal to rate times time. Once again, this is assuming, that assumes a constant rate. Our rate in this example

is clearly changing. We are clearly accelerating

right over here but maybe we can approximate the distance traveled if we assume a constant rate over an interval, say over

two second intervals. Then we just, we try to roughly, when we assume some velocity

over that interval. When we take these

right handed rectangles, let’s just focus on this first rectangle. If I’m taking the area of this first rectangle, what am I doing? I’m multiplying it’s

height times it’s width. It’s height is going to be the velocity at the end of two seconds and

it’s width is the two seconds. If I were to multiply six feet per second times two seconds. That will get me 12 feet,

let me make that very clear. The area for that one area is equal to six feet per second, my

velocity, it’s actually the speed but we’re not going to get particular about whether we’re getting the direction as well. Six feet per second times two seconds. That’s going to get me 12 feet. That we can say is an

approximation because we’re saying “Okay, you

trialed at two seconds “at some velocity” but is that going to be an overestimate or an underestimate? It’s going to be an overestimate because you’re taking the fastest velocity over the interval. The interval started with the cyclist going zero feet per second. It’s clearly overestimating

and if you think about it and I encourage you to pause the video and think about it on your own. If we did a left handed rectangle it would be underestimating it because we would be taking the slowest

velocity over the interval and multiplying it by the interval. This is an approximation. Let’s just calculate what r of six is. R of six is going to be the area of this rectangle which, as we just said, it’s six feet per second times two seconds so it’s going to be 12

feet and then we have this rectangle which

is going to be 7.5 feet per second times two

seconds which is going to be 15 feet, 15 feet

and you can even see it in the area right over here. It’s going to be three feet more. One, two and then half of two of these to it’s going to be three feet more and then the area of this one which is going to be 8.5, so our velocity at the end of the interval is going to be 8.5 feet per seconds times two seconds which is 17 feet and then plus this area

which is our velocity at the end of the interval which is nine feet per second times two seconds so plus 18 and then we get the

velocity of this area which is going to be this height. The velocity at the end of the interval which is 9.5 feet per second times two seconds so, plus 19. Then finally this area

which is the velocity at the end of the

interval which is ten feet per second times two seconds so, plus 20. What does this give us? This is the point of which I’m most likely going to make an error. 12 plus 15 is 27 and then 27 plus 10 is 37 plus another seven is

44, so that gives us 44. 44 plus 18 is going to give me, let’s see, I can get to 52 and then

62, so this is going to be 62 plus 19 is 81, plus 20 is 101, that’s going to be in feet. Capital r of six, 101 feet, it is an approximation for the total distance traveled during the 12 seconds but it’s really an over approximation because for every interval, we’re taking the fastest velocity of the interval. If we took the slowest

velocity of the interval in would be an underestimate. If we did left handed

rectangles and we might have gotten something in between if we say maybe took the average of these too. If we made the height of the rectangle three for this first one

or something like that. We’ll do that in the

future, in future videos.

isnt the trapesium rule more precise?

who needs this crap

does the R(

6) mean the number of sub-divisions for the approximation?